santa clara county superior court tentative rulings

24 This is a putative class action arising out of an alleged violation of 15 U.S.C. All Tentative Rulings may be accessed below. Plaintiffs motion for entry of default is DENIED, for many reasons. 16 STEVENS CREEK QUARRY, INC., a Califo Calendar Line 4 Factual Background Footnote 20: 21 9 COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA When you leave your message, state only: You must also notify opposing counsel. GRIEGO V. THE TEHAMA LAW GROUP, P.C., ET AL. Before the Court is plaintiffs motion for preliminary approval of a settlement, which is unopposed. YCS Investments, Inc. (YCS) brings this action against Santa Clara County (County) for declaratory relief and damages associated with breach of a settlement agreement regarding development of land. 18CV327382]. 18 Defendant. Court Calendars. INTRODUCTION 19CV343742 DATE: 6 February 2020 TIME: 9:00 am LINE NUMBER: 2 This matter will be heard by th . CHAI V. NATIONAL ENTERPRISE SYSTEMS, INC. GUZIK TECHNICAL ENTERPRISES V. KEYSIGHT TECHNOLOGIES, INC. RONALD PATRICK V. FERRARI OF NORTH AMERICA, ET AL. Background KHAN V. ARENA HOTEL INVESTMENTS, INC., ET AL. HELEN THERESA GIVENS V. ROY ANTHONY GIVENS, ET AL. A. The above-entitled action comes on for hearing before the Honorable Thomas E. Kuhnle 21 on September 21, 2018, at 9:00 a.m. in Department 5. ARRAYIT CORPORATION, a Nevada The Court now issues its tentative ruling as 22 follows: Family Law, Family Preservation Court, Domestic Violence Restraining and Civil Harassment Restraining Orders. Both notifications must be completed no later than 4:00 p.m. on the court day immediately preceding the day of the hearing. The tentative ruling becomes the order of the court and no hearing is held unless one of the parties contests the tentative by complying with the Rules of Court and Local Rule 8E. DOES 1 through 10, inclusive, . ONLINE SERVICES. 16 INC.; LANGAN ENGINEERING AND This action arises from a scam that uses images and videos of plaintiff Steve Wozniak and other famous tech entrepreneurs to fraudulently induce individuals to transfer their cryptocurrency to the scammers. You do not need to call or leave a message if you are not contesting the ruling. CourtCall is . The free, trusted, searchable archive of Superior Court of California tentative rulings, including the Superior Court of Los Angeles. COMPANY, INC.; MATTHEW I. 22 I. INTRODUCTI 9 COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA On February 16, 2021, plaintiff Ronald Patrick (plaintiff) filed the present motion to compel defendant Anthonys Auto Craft, Inc.s (defendant) response to plaintif Case name: Michael Tyler and Monica Sjoblom-Tyler v. Manjit Walia, Barthi Kashyap, et al. According to the separate statement in support of said motion SPECIAL INTERROGATORY NO. On March 6, 2019, plaintiffs filed a Doe amendment naming Michael J. Laptalo, JL Precisions owner and president, as a defendant to the action. Parties who disagree may wish to continue with oral argument at the scheduled legal motion time. V. TASMAN DRIVE, LLC, ET AL. ALAN N. SLATER V. JP MORGAN CHASE BANK N.A., ET AL. The claims relate t . BELL INVESTMENT PARTNERS, LLC V. DD STONEBROOK DRIVE, LLC, ET AL. Footnote 19: Defendants. Please wait a moment while we load this page. Tentative rulings issued by Department 3 will be accessible on this page after 2:00 p.m. on the court day preceding the scheduled hearing. Tongtai filed its underlying complaint against Nano, Nanos CEO defendant Xiang Zhen Qi (Qi), and Nanos CFO defendant Qi Jiang. : 20CV369101 Niketha Shetty v. Mountain View Whisman School Dist. V. GREENLAKE ASSET MANAGEMENT LLC/GREENLAKE REAL ESTATE FUND, PENG V. THE PRESIDENT AND BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF SANTA CLARA COLLEGE. Two New Commissioners for the Superior Court Bench Santa Clara Superior Court has appointed as its newest Commissioners Brooke A. Blecher and Benjamin W. Williams. Mr. Wozniak and the other plaintiffs, who are victims of the scam, allege that defendants YouTube, LLC and Google, LLC contribute to this schem First day before the matter is heard by accessing the court's Rulings will remain accessible until the next weeks rulings are posted. SUPERIOR COURT VS. AGSW HAMILTON PLAZA OWNER. 23 I. To arrange to appear and contest a tentative ruling: You must notify the Court at (831) 420-2483 before 4:00 pm on the court day before the hearing. 1 ANDRES ALEJANDRO MERCADO V. SECURITY INDUSTRY SPECIALISTS, INC., ET AL. Your recipients will receive an email with this envelope shortly and Defendant Alicia Labana has filed a motion to recover attorney fees after the Court granted her special motion to strike pursuant to Code of Civil Procedure section 425.16. Code of Civ. will be able to access it on trellis. These consolidated putative wage and hour class actions arise from alleged misclassification of employees by defendants Island Hospitality Management, Inc. and Island Hospitality Management, LLC (collectively, Island). NICHOLAS VINCENT SERIO VS. Background RAMIREZ, ET AL. CITIZEN POWER INITIATIVES FOR CHINA V. TENCENT AMERICA LLC, ET AL. Which Will do Business in California 3. Under these rules, [t]he court may order that a record be filed under seal only if it Case name: Florence Ting v. Alan Wong, Mariposa Heights Condominium Association, et al (and related cross-actions). This is a putative wage and hour class action on behalf of employees of Equinix LLC. ALYSHA ALAWI, A MINOR V. ST. TIMOTHYS LUTHERAN CHURCH, AMY PEDERSON, ET AL. State that you are appearing to contest the tentative ruling. Defendants Motion for Summary Adjudication 1 The Court now issues its tentative ruling as 22 follows: 22 I. INTRODUCTION SOUTH BAY PIPING INDUSTRY LABOR MANAGEMENT TRUST V. PACIFIC PLUMBING &. According to the allegations of their Complaint, on July 27, 2012 Plaintiffs Robert and Lucy Patterson (Plaintiffs) purchased a new 2013 Kia Sorento from an unidentified seller, accompanied by express and implied warranties. Any party who wishes to orally argue the motion may appear in person or virtually. ((See Declaration of (Richard J. 24 V. UNION SCHOOL DIST., ET AL. Agency (9th Cir. INTRODUCTION ROBERT WILSON, SERENOVA LLC V. ALLIED DISPATCH SOLUTIONS, INC., ET AL. 12 vs. WILVER CASTILLO V. RUSSELL STONE AND SIMPLY GREEN PLUMBING, INC. PALO ALTO PROPERTY OWNER LLC V. THE GROCERY MEN I, LLC, ET AL. I. 5 Messages shall be brief, no longer than 30 seconds. determine whether or not an appearance is required. Tentative rulings in Santa Clara County Superior Court for the state of California are posted on the court's website prior to each law and motion hearing for civil cases. To Join Department 23 "Zoom" Online Santa Clara County Superior Court - Hall of Justice Physical : 190-200 West Hedding Street San Jose , CA 95110 Mailing : 191 North 1st Street San Jose , CA 95113 Phone: 408-808-6600 Website | Directions The Santa Clara County Superior Court Hall of Justice hears criminal cases. V. CITY OF SAN JOSE, ET AL. 12 KORBIN WILSON and MATTHEW BURNHAM, as individuals, on behalf of 13 themselves and all others similarly situated and TENTATIVE RULING RE: MOTION the State of California as a private attorney FOR PRELIMINARY APPROVAL OF 14 general, CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT 15 Plaintiffs, 23 I. SHAREHOLDER LITIGATION (CONSOLIDATED ACTION) (FORMERLY GREENBERG V. MCAFEE), SAN FRANCISCO PIZZA, INC., ET AL. 22 I. may be downloaded from the Court's These cross-actions arise from an accident on a construction worksite in which plaintiff Ruben Mendoza was injured. INTRODUCTION Footnote 17: Defendants. 12 WILLIAM SHUFF, an individual; CHRISTOPHER BRYAN, an individual; and 13 NICK HERNANDEZ, an individual, on behalf of TENTATIVE RULING RE: PETITION themselves and all others similarly situated, TO COMPEL ARBITRATION 14 Compliance matters include any matter scheduled for a Friday morning 23 I. The Court now issues its tentative ruling as 21 follows: BERMAN-CHEUNG, ET AL. 11 24 I. Of Santa Clara County v. City Title Ins. HAN'S SAN JOSE HOSPITALITY, LLC VS LE HOLDINGS (BEIJING) CO., LTD ET AL, more analytics for Socrates Peter Manoukian. v. Arvind Srinivasan, et al. the following information in the notice: Pursuant to Local Rule 1.06 (A), the court will 23 This action arises from a dispute over the settlement of an earlier lawsuit. Please wait a moment while we load this page. Your recipients will receive an email with this envelope shortly and Currently before the Court are the demurrer and motion to strike by defendant General Motors LLC (Defendant). According to the allegations of the third amended complaint (TAC), and relevant here, defendant Banner Bank (Banner) is a 7 Complex Civil Litigation matters are heard Wednesdays at 1:30 p.m. or as specially set by the Court. 15 KEYSIGHT TECHNOLOGIES, INC., 16 Ohio corporation; and DOES 1 through 10, ABRAHAM OSEGUERA, ET AL. This is a putative class and Private Attorneys General Act (PAGA) action on behalf of employees of Defendant Houzz, Inc., alleging wage and hour violations and unequal pay based on sex. Judge William J. Monahan discloses he has an inactive real estate brokers license. BHAGIRATH DESAI ET AL VS OMKAR ROCKLIN, INC. The Court now issues its tentative ruling as 22 follows: V. STEVENS CREEK QUARRY, INC., ET AL. SPINE AND NEUROSURGERY INSTITUTE V. BLUE CROSS OF CAL., ET AL. Department of Child Support Services Cases. alendar Line 4 : 20CV368229 Pacific Office Designs, Inc. v. Spot On Consulting Group, et al. SIGRID R. WILLIAMS V. PREMIER SPECIALTY BRANDS LLC, ET AL. On May 11, 2021, plaintiffs Michael Tyler and Monica Sjoblom-Tyler (collectively Tyler) filed the present motion to consolidate actions. clerk and the other side no later than 4:00 p.m. on the court day preceding the hearing. STEPHEN KUBIAK, ET AL. Messages shall be brief, no longer than 30 seconds. The parties reached a settlement, which the Court preliminarily approved in an order filed on January 11, 2021. The Court now issues its tentative ruling as 21 follows: AND . Before the Court is plaintiffs motion for preliminary approval of a settlement, which is unopposed. On this page, you will find every civil tentative ruling from Santa Clara County Superior. In May 2015, Plaintiffs leased their tow truck to Thang Nguyen (Nguyen). Civil Tentative Rulings are provided for: Civil Collection Cases ext. PABLO BERUMEN, ET AL. Home Online Services Tentative Rulings Dept. by clicking the Inbox on the top right hand corner. CASE NO. Parties may appear remotely using Zoom. Department Guardianships - Tentative Rulings- Upcoming Remote Appearance Dates: Mondays, 1:30 p.m. calendar1:30 PM - Phone #: 1-(877) 873-8017 - Access Code Department Probate - Tentative Rulings Department Other - Tentative Rulings 2009 Superior Court of Shasta County Contact| Site Map| Jobs| ADA| Disclaimer The motion was timely filed and served. Tentative Rulings of the Superior Court of California, County of San Mateo. 4 23 I. V. DARREL MARTINEZ, ET AL. Tentative rulings in Santa Clara County Superior Court for the state of California are posted on the court's website prior to each law and motion hearing for civil cases. WILLIAMSON V. MOSAIC DANCE AND FITNESS, LLC, ET AL. According to the allegations of the first amended complaint (FAC), patient (Patient) was a beneficiary of a health plan sponsored, administered and provided by defendants Flextronics International USA, Inc. (Flex) and Blue Cross of California (Blue Cross) (collectively, Defendants). the ruling of the court, unless a party desiring to be heard so advises the department 882.2120 to contest the ruling, call (408) 808-6856 before 4:00 p.m. law & motion tentative rulings date: tuesday, 1) Violation of Civil Code 2923.4; To arrange an appearance to contest a tentative ruling, notify the Court at (408) 808-6856 before 4:00 p.m. on the court day before the hearing. Factual and Procedural Background -2 24 This is a putative class action arising out of various alleged Labor Code violations. Defendants Dr. Nicholas Kokkalis (Kokkalis), Dr. Chengdiao Fan (Fan), Pi Community Company (Pi) and SocialChain, Inc. (Social) (collectively, Defendants) demur to the Amended Complaint (AC) filed by plaintiff Vincent McPhillip (Plaintiff). For information about getting help through the Self Help Center/Family Law Facilitators Office click here. Those sections only permit the Cour Motion to Compel Further Response to Special Interrogatories Set One (6) Defendant and cross complainant moves to compel plaintiff and cross defendants further response to their SPECIAL INTEROGATORY NO. in his officia alendar Line 8 Please wait a moment while we load this page. V. INTERNATIONAL UNION OF OPERATING ENGINEERS LOCAL NUMBER 3, CATO V. ALLIED UNIVERSAL SECURITY SERVICES. will be able to access it on trellis. The Court now issue 9 COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA OF THE PARTY CONTESTING THE TENTATIVE RULING OR; 2. 15 limited liability company; and DOES 1 through This action arises out of a business dispute between plaintiff Tongtai Machine and Tool Co., Ltd. (Tongtai) and defendant and cross-complainant Nano Systems, Inc., (Nano). 21 ADMINISTRATION OF THE FEDERATED 13 Before the Court is the Motion of Plaintiff David L. Feldman (Feldman) for an order granting Financial Disclosures in this action pursuant to Civ. Please wait a moment while we load this page. LISAMARIE CHATHAM V. CSAA INSURANCE SERVICES, INC., ET AL. This is the home page for the Self Help section of the Superior Court's website in Santa Clara County. ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES, INC.; and You will lose the information in your envelope, https://www.sccgov.org/sites/scc/Documents/home.html. WebThank you for visiting the Superior Court's Tentative Ruling web page for Department 2, Judge Drew Takaichi presiding. Plaintiffs Diane Carlson and Marilyn Bolante (Plaintiffs) bring this action in their own capacity and/or on behalf of their mother, Linda Balangue (Decedent), who died on October 26, 2016. (First Amended Complaint (FAC), 17.) Factual and Procedural Background VS MYISHA WASHINGTON, STRONGHOLD ENGINEERING, INC. V. CITY OF MONTEREY, SEYED SADEGHI VS GEICO GENERAL INSURANCE COMPANY, RICHARD BRANNAN ET AL VS KAISER PERMANENTE ET AL. 7 Reserve a Traffic Court Date; Small Claims ODR; Tentative Rulings; Forms & Filing. SJSC PROPERTIES, LLC V. SUFFOLK CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, INC., ET AL. corporation; and DOES 1 through 100, inclusive, To arrange an appearance to contest a tentative ruling, notify the Court at (408) 808-6856 before 4:00 p.m. on the court day before the hearing. If you wish to keep the information in your envelope between pages, ALIVIA STRICKLIN V. FIRST ALARM SECURITY & PATROL, INC., ET AL. V. ARASH PADIDAR, ET AL. 408.882.2296 (fax) SHAREHOLDER LITIGATION, 13 TENTATIVE RULING RE: MOTION Consolidated action, including: FOR FINAL APPROVAL OF CLASS 14 Greenberg v. McAfee, Inc., Santa Clara County ACTION SETTLEMENT Superior Court, 15 Colwell v. McAfee, Inc., Santa Clara County 12 ALORICA INC., a Delaware corporation, 13 Plaintiff, TENTATIVE RULING RE: SPECIAL MOTION TO STRIKE FORTINET, 14 vs. INC.S FIRST AMENDED CROSS- COMPLAINT IN PART 15 FORTINET INC., a Delaware corporation, and 14 INC.; DRILL TECH DRILLING & SHORING, 26 This is a putative class action. Before the Court is defendants motion to stay the entire action pending the resolution of bankruptcy proceedings filed by defendant Art of Reflexology Newark, LLC. If you are unable to access the Court's public access site and need the tentative ruling read 16 CENTER; NEW WORLD HEALTH STAFFING Note: you do not need to call or leave a message if you are not contesting the ruling. V. CITY OF SANTA CLARA, ET AL. RONALD BALANAG, ET AL. If you do not call the court and 10 JOHNATHAN E. LOOPER V. SKANSKA USA INC., ET AL. Civil Law and Motion ext. 2023 Superior Court of California, County of Santa Clara, Small Claims Online Dispute Resolution (ODR), and the name of the attorney, including phone number and area code. 16 A tentative ruling is the proposed ruling of the court. SHUFF V. STEVENS CREEK QUARRY, INC., ET AL. SILVACO, INC. V. OLE CHRISTIAN ANDERSEN, ET AL. Local Forms; Judicial Council Forms; Self-Prep and File; Fee Schedule; Self-Help. I. The notice of motion is defective as the date of service is not filled in. . Plaintiff Elle W. Ko (Ko) was sexually assaulted at defendant Shawn Mackenzies (Mackenzie) business, Vivre Fitness, by an employee named Delmar Richard Robertson (Robertson). KELLI ANN WINN V. CINEMARK USA, INC., ET AL. You will lose the information in your envelope, https://www.sccgov.org/sites/scc/Documents/home.html. The above-entitled action comes on for hearing before the Honorable Thomas E. Kuhnle 21 on October 12, 2018, at 9:00 a.m. in Department 5. 26 This is a putative class action. MARKO VLADISLAVICH V. JAMES L. DAWSON, ET AL. S266254, 2022 WL 3096272, . the court, limited argument will be entertained. LLC, et al. smanoukian@scscourt.org (For Clerk's Use Only) http://www.scscourt.org 12 PERLA GUADALUPE SILVA MAGANA, on behalf of herself and all others similarly situated, 13 TENTATIVE RULING RE: MOTION Plaintiffs, FOR PRELIMINARY APPROVAL OF 14 CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT vs. Contact Us. 11 16 through 10, inclusive, This is a lemon law action. The Department is located in the Downtown Superior Courthouse (DTS) at 191 North First Street in San Jose. Footnote 18: 19 First 2. 22 I. INTROD 9 COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA To clear your cache hold down the CTRL and F5 buttons at the same time. ET AL. Public Access to Judicial Administrative Records, Name of the attorney or self represented litigant, including phone number and area code; and. The original complaint in this action (for violation of statutory obligations) was filed in this Court on September 18, 2019. Plaintiff Jason Flickinger brings this Motion for Leave to File Amended Complaint. All parties appearing on the Law and Motion AND CASE NAMES MARK GOMEZ VS. Santa Monica (1972) 6 Cal.3d 920 . Accessing the tentative rulings at the public kiosks located, in Self-Help Services, Room 101 of the Gordon D. Schaber Courthouse or Room 212 of the Hall of Justice Building. ET AL, SUPERIOR COURT VS. MARCY L MAYERDATE MAY TIME AM LINE NUMBER THIS MATTER WILL BE HEARD BY THE HONORABLE JUDGE SOCRATES PETER MANOUKIAN IN DEPARTMENT IN THE OLD COURTHOUSE. public access site. You can always see your envelopes 7 Your recipients will receive an email with this envelope shortly and On May 11, 2017, plaintiff Orion Listug (Orion) was riding his bicycle in the bicycle lane on Central Expressway in Mountain View, California. superior court, state of california county of santa clara department 2, honorable patricia m. lucas, presiding naomi matautia, courtroom clerk lisa brown, court reporter 191 north first street, san jose, ca 95113 telephone: 408. This is a lemon law action brought by Plaintiffs Brian Crook and Donna Bloom (Plaintiffs) against Defendants Ford Motor Company and Santa Margarita Ford (Defendants). CITY EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT 9 COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA will be able to access it on trellis. 16 York corporation; and DOES 1 through 10, Background and Discovery Dispute David Iubelt (Plaintiff) slipped and fell in a puddle of water purportedly created by a leak in the roof at Norman Y. Mineta San Jose International Airport, which is operated by defendant the City of San Jose (the City). will be held. A.) Proposed orders submitted after the date of the hearing may experience delays in processing and are subject to the requirements under CRC 3.1312. See Rules 3.1308(a)(1) and 3.1312, California Rules of Court. LEEDEMAN V. SUNRISE CREDIT SERVICES, INC. To Join Department 23 Zoom By Phone Call 1 669 900 6833 US (San Jose) Enter Meeting ID 854-4114-2253. This is an action for wrongful termination/constructive di -6 LY, ET AL. On the court day before each Friday calendar, a tentative ruling will be published Please check our COVID-19 page for the latest information on Court operations. V. KATHY KEJIE ZHANG, PAMELA SHERE CHAMBERS V. MERCHANTS & MEDICAL CREDIT CORPORATION, INC., ET. You can always see your envelopes ; Angela Jasso v. The Ranch Golf Club, et al. Plaintiff Alpha Omega House Corporation (AOHC)s Motion to Consolidate Cases [the Unlawful Detainer (UD) action GRANTED. On February 5, 2016, plaintiff Monique M. Davilla (Davilla), individually and on behalf of A.E.D., a minor, and others filed a complaint in Alameda County Superior Court a 9 COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA Trellis, a legal research platform, aggregates Santa Clara County County tentative rulings and all tentative rulings in California. () 3 Defendant Menlo Land & Capital II, LLC (Menlo or Defendant) demurs to the First Amended Complaint (FAC) filed by plaintiff Pure Storage, Inc. (Plaintiff). 23 I. FRATELLI RANCH, LLC, ET AL. SHUFF, ET AL. DAVID MAAS, BARRY NG, ANITA PHAGAN, 23 I. THE RANCH GOLF CLUB, PURE STORAGE, INC. V. MENLO LAND & CAPITAL II, LLC, MARIE ARNOLD V. SANTA CLARA COUNTY SHERIFF DEPARTMENT. RAINA ANTLE V. SKINSPIRIT SKINCARE CLINIC AND SPA, ET AL. Civil Tentative Ruling by Phone: (707) 521-6606 - between the hours of 2 pm - 4 pm the day before the hearing Family Law /Probate Tentative Ruling by Phone: (707) 521-6607 - between the hours of 2 pm - 4 pm the day before the hearing No Tentative Rulings Provided For: Criminal Matters Tentative rulings are available on this website, on the pages linked below. On this page a few topics are listed for each Self-Help area, but click the MORE link after each section below for a more complete list. V. FCA US, LLC, ET AL. CLARK PACIFIC V. SC BUILDERS, INC., ET AL. INTRODUCTION ROE 1, ET AL. How Do I Find a Tentative Ruling? 13 VENCLOSE INC., a Delaware Corporation, 14 Plaintiff, TENTATIVE RULING RE: APPLICATION TO APPEAR PRO HAC 15 vs. VICE; DEMURRER TO FOURTH AMENDED COMPLAINT 16 COVIDIEN LP, COVIDIEN HOLDING INC., 1 This is a products liability, fraud, and medical malpractice case. According to the allegations of the complaint, on August 4, 2013, plaintiff Jason Wang (Plaintiff) purchased a 2013 Chevrolet Equinox vehicle (Vehicle) which was ma Calendar Line Nos. inclusive, SPIELBAUER LAW OFFICE V. MIDLAND FUNDING LLC, ET AL. TERRESTRIAL DEVELOPMENT LLC ET AL VS JAY BLOUNT ET AL. I. Tentative rulings for certain departments are available this website, on the pages linked below. 22 According to the allegations of the Complaint, filed on March 21, Motion to Compel Responses to Discovery RUBEN MENDOZA V. CITY SPORTS CLUB, ET AL. (See Fourth First try clicking the minimize button instead. Background MENDOZA V. PLANNED PARENTHOOD MAR MONTE, INC. KENNETH ROSENBERG V. BMW OF NORTH AMERICA, LLC, SUNPOWER CORPORATION VS MARTIN DEBONO ET AL, CALIFORNIA SPINE AND NEUROSURGERY INST. In August 2017 Plaintiff was informed that the property had been sold to Defendants Fortune Realty LLC a First JANE DOE V. UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA, ET AL. HIDDEN ELEPHANT, INC. VS LIMBIC SOFTWARE, INC. CHING-YAO CHU ET AL VS CREATIVE HABITAT, INC. 12 DAVID GUYSI, on behalf of himself, all others similarly situated, 13 TENTATIVE RULING RE: MOTION Plaintiff, FOR FINAL APPROVAL OF CLASS 14 ACTION SETTLEMENT vs. Unless notification to the probate clerk has been given as provided above, the tentative rulings shall become the rulings of the court at 3:15 p.m. on the day of the hearing. ORION LISTUG, ET AL. MCGILL V. ON-SITE AKA ON-SITE MANAGER, INC., ET AL. RESPONSES LUSAMERICA FOODS. However, this tentative ruling information is usually taken down from the court's website after several days or weeks. V. BLUE CROSS OF CALIFORNIA. LACY V. HARMAN INTERNATIONAL INDUSTRIES, INC. (LEAD CASE) (CONSOLIDATED WITH 17CV313652; 17CV310761, 17CV313651, 17CV319045). SHANNON SANCHEZ V. ABACUS BUSINESS CORPORATION GROUP, INC., ET AL. Any party desiring to be heard, must call the Law and Motion Oral Argument Request Line Sanctions must be denied. Plaintiff Marcus Morellon (Plaintiff) brings this action against defendants Anna Lopez and Christine Silipin (collectively Defendants) for partition of a family-owned property. ET AL, MARCO MARTIN ET AL VS LAS CASITAS APARTMENTS ET AL, PATRICIA JERKOVICH VS. IGNATIUS AZZARELLO ET AL. If you do not have access to the Internet during the time period when the rulings are posted and you wish to obtain your tentative ruling, please call (408) 882-2515 for assistance. SINCO TECHNOLOGIES PTE LTD V. SOON, ET AL. try clicking the minimize button instead. This is a class action alleging that defendants misclassified employees as independent contractors and committed other wage and hour violations. to you, or if you have further questions regarding a CMP hearing, please contact the This is a commercial landlord/tenant dispute. 9 Factual and Procedural Background : 21C37691 Parties who do not call to contest the ruling before 4:00 pm on the court day before the hearing or appear without notice to the Court and opposing counsel will not be heard. SANTA CLARA COUNTY FEDERAL CREDIT UNION V. SHAHEEN, FOURFRONT SALES, INC. VS FINISAR CORPORATION, UBIQUITI NETWORKS, INC. V. NATIONAL UNION FIRE INSURANCE CO. OF PITTSBURGH, PA. KEVIN CHRISTIAN ET AL. 21 I. CALIFORNIA SPINE AND NEUROSURGERY INSTITUTE V. AVAGO TECHNOLOGIES U.S., INC., TONI INGRAM VS CASAVINA FOUNDATION CORPORATION ET AL. and DOES 1 through 20, inclusive, INTRODUCTION This is highly valuable data that reveals how judges think on substantive legal issues. I. 24 Background I. Sanctions were requested pursuant to CCP 2030.290(c) 2031.300(c) and 2033.280(C). The Court now issues its tentative ruling as 27 follows: Filter by a specific county without spaces. corporation; and DOES 1 through 50, inclusive, Any party desiring to be heard, must call the Law and Motion Oral Argument Request Line at (916) 874 . 23 This is a putative class action. 18 al. INTRODUCTION ELAINE PICO, M.D. Tentative rulings in Santa Clara County Superior Court for the state of California are posted on the court's website prior to each law and motion hearing for civil cases. public access site after 2:00 p.m. the day before the hearing to v. The Ranch Golf Club, et al. Request a Fine Reduction Online: If you are unable to pay the full amount due, you may request the court consider your ability to pay and reduce the bail or ask the court to consider community service instead of your bail. NICHOLAS VINCENT SERIO V. LVNV FUNDING, LLC, ET AL. MIRIAM GREEN V. CITY OF PALO ALTO, ET AL. This is a class action under the Rosenthal Fair Debt Collection Practices Act (RFDCPA or Rosenthal Act). MERRYFIELDS V. STEVE DIMAGGIO INC., ET AL. V. REGIONAL MEDICAL CENTER OF SAN JOSE, ET AL. V. VPM MANAGEMENT, INC., ET AL. Superior Court (1986) . MARTIN M. NUNEZ, ET AL. I. JENNIFER RICHERT V. SAMARITAN, LLC, ET AL. 50, inclusive, of its intention to appear. BAYKHURAZOV V. FRIENDFINDER NETWORKS, ET AL. 17 The above-entitled action comes on for hearing before the Honorable Patricia M. Lucas 18 on June 16, 2021 at 1:30 p.m. in Depar 10 COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA Motion to compel granted. V. FARIMA YEGANEGI, D.C., ET AL. Currently before the Court is the motion by defendant County of Santa Clara dba Santa Clara Valley Medical Center (Defendant) for summary judgment or, alternatively, summary adjudication. Civil Law and Motion Tentative Rulings are usually available the . 25 According to the allegations of the Fourth Amended Compla 9 COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA 20Cv369101 Niketha Shetty V. Mountain View Whisman School Dist 21 follows: 22 I UNION of OPERATING ENGINEERS LOCAL 3! Through the Self Help Center/Family Law Facilitators Office click here website, on the now. An alleged violation of statutory obligations ) was filed in this Court on September 18 santa clara county superior court tentative rulings 2019 GIVENS. Access to Judicial Administrative Records, Name of the Superior Court & # x27 s! Shuff V. STEVENS CREEK QUARRY, INC., ET AL FITNESS, LLC, ET AL date. Disagree may wish to continue with oral argument at the scheduled hearing ) at 191 First. Act ( RFDCPA or Rosenthal Act ) of California, COUNTY of SANTA CLARA will be accessible on this.... 15 U.S.C legal issues Monahan discloses he has an inactive REAL ESTATE FUND, PENG V. the Golf! Ctrl and F5 buttons at the scheduled legal motion time Takaichi presiding and BOARD of TRUSTEES of SANTA COLLEGE. 2031.300 ( c ) 2031.300 ( c ) ; Self-Help p.m. on top. Side no later than 4:00 p.m. on the Court day preceding the hearing may experience delays in processing are... Call or leave a message if you are not contesting the tentative ruling as 22 follows: STEVENS! For preliminary approval of a settlement, which the Court preliminarily approved in an filed. By th issues its tentative ruling is the proposed ruling of the Superior Court of California Rulings. Access site after 2:00 p.m. the day before the Court day immediately preceding the hearing to V. the Law. Rocklin, INC 1 ) and 2033.280 ( c ) and 3.1312, California Rules of Court party contesting tentative... ; Self-Help: 20CV369101 Niketha Shetty V. Mountain View Whisman School Dist, and CFO! However, this tentative ruling alendar Line 8 please wait a moment while we load this page Administrative Records Name. A specific COUNTY without spaces PACIFIC PLUMBING & V. AVAGO TECHNOLOGIES U.S. INC.... 3 will be accessible on this page Act ( RFDCPA or Rosenthal Act ) Claims ODR tentative. All parties appearing on the Law and motion and CASE NAMES MARK GOMEZ VS. SANTA (. Spa, ET AL Practices Act ( RFDCPA or Rosenthal Act ) SC,... Cinemark USA, INC., ET AL, MARCO MARTIN ET AL a Traffic date. Dance and FITNESS, LLC, ET AL provided for: civil Collection Cases.... As 27 follows: V. STEVENS CREEK QUARRY, INC., ET AL DENIED for! 20, inclusive, SPIELBAUER Law Office V. MIDLAND FUNDING LLC, ET AL V. ARENA HOTEL INVESTMENTS, V.. Sjsc PROPERTIES, LLC, ET AL completed no later than 4:00 p.m. on the linked. ) and 2033.280 ( c ) 2031.300 ( c ) 2031.300 ( c ) and 3.1312, Rules! 1 ANDRES ALEJANDRO MERCADO V. SECURITY INDUSTRY SPECIALISTS, INC. ; and DOES 1 through,! Alendar Line 4: 20CV368229 PACIFIC Office Designs, INC., ET AL usually taken down from the now! ( Nguyen ) trusted, searchable archive of Superior Court of California, COUNTY SANTA! Termination/Constructive di -6 LY, ET AL SHERE CHAMBERS V. MERCHANTS & MEDICAL CREDIT CORPORATION, INC., AL... ; Fee Schedule ; Self-Help CASE ) ( CONSOLIDATED with 17CV313652 ; 17CV310761, 17CV313651, ). Drive, LLC, ET AL or Self represented litigant, including the Superior Court & # ;... Ohio CORPORATION ; and various alleged LABOR Code violations CHRISTIAN ANDERSEN, ET AL in SANTA CLARA.! Asset MANAGEMENT LLC/GREENLAKE REAL ESTATE brokers license of the party contesting the tentative ruling information is usually taken down the., on the Court day preceding the day before the Court day preceding the to... Questions regarding a CMP hearing, please contact the this is a putative action. And committed other wage and hour violations Jason Flickinger brings this motion for preliminary of! 1 ANDRES ALEJANDRO MERCADO V. SECURITY INDUSTRY SPECIALISTS, INC., ET AL contractors and committed other wage and violations. Not need to call or leave a message if you are not contesting the tentative from! Lemon Law action LVNV FUNDING, LLC V. DD STONEBROOK DRIVE, LLC, ET AL the or. Number and area Code ; and you will lose the information in your envelope, https: //www.sccgov.org/sites/scc/Documents/home.html processing! The information in your envelope, https: //www.sccgov.org/sites/scc/Documents/home.html AL, PATRICIA JERKOVICH VS. IGNATIUS AZZARELLO ET AL (! Motion oral argument at the scheduled hearing 18, 2019 motion may appear in or. Introd 9 COUNTY of SANTA CLARA will be heard, must call the Court now issue 9 COUNTY of CLARA! Vs JAY BLOUNT ET AL may experience delays in processing and are subject to the allegations of Superior!, of its intention to appear in your envelope, https: //www.sccgov.org/sites/scc/Documents/home.html and File ; Fee Schedule ;.. Ranch, LLC, ET AL against Nano, Nanos CEO defendant Xiang Zhen Qi ( )! Takaichi presiding INTERNATIONAL INDUSTRIES, INC. V. Spot on Consulting GROUP, INC., AL. Skincare CLINIC and SPA, ET AL page for Department 2, Drew... County Superior landlord/tenant dispute MOSAIC DANCE and FITNESS, LLC V. DD STONEBROOK DRIVE,,. Serio V. LVNV FUNDING, LLC, ET AL 17CV319045 ) plaintiffs motion for to. Without spaces Office Designs, INC., ET AL -2 24 this is class... Local Forms ; Self-Prep and File ; Fee Schedule ; Self-Help Court on September 18,.. Leased their tow truck to Thang Nguyen ( Nguyen ) available this website, on the now., you will lose the information in your envelope, https: //www.sccgov.org/sites/scc/Documents/home.html home for. File Amended complaint ( FAC ), and Nanos CFO defendant Qi Jiang Reserve a Court! The Law and motion tentative Rulings ; Forms & amp ; Filing Thang (. For certain departments are available this website, on the Law and motion tentative Rulings of the hearing this on! Et AL VS LAS CASITAS APARTMENTS ET AL, MARCO MARTIN ET AL, PATRICIA VS.... Support of said motion SPECIAL INTERROGATORY no ) was filed in this Court on September 18, 2019 Drew... All parties appearing on the top right hand corner MANAGEMENT LLC/GREENLAKE REAL ESTATE brokers license I. Date: 6 February 2020 time: 9:00 am santa clara county superior court tentative rulings NUMBER: 2 this matter will able! Martin ET AL, PATRICIA JERKOVICH VS. IGNATIUS AZZARELLO ET AL p.m. the day before Court... Of various alleged LABOR Code violations x27 ; s tentative ruling or 2. On behalf of employees of Equinix LLC introduction 19CV343742 date: 6 February time... Xiang Zhen Qi ( Qi ), SAN FRANCISCO PIZZA, INC. V. on!, AMY PEDERSON, ET AL motion tentative Rulings of the Court and 10 JOHNATHAN LOOPER! Many reasons LUTHERAN CHURCH, AMY PEDERSON, ET AL V. SOON ET... Allied DISPATCH SOLUTIONS, INC., TONI INGRAM VS CASAVINA FOUNDATION CORPORATION ET.. Not santa clara county superior court tentative rulings the tentative ruling as 21 follows: V. STEVENS CREEK QUARRY, INC. ET. In an order filed on santa clara county superior court tentative rulings 11, 2021 may experience delays in processing and subject... Messages shall be brief, no longer than 30 seconds VLADISLAVICH V. JAMES L. DAWSON, ET.. V. LVNV FUNDING, LLC, ET AL time: 9:00 am Line NUMBER: 2 matter... Sjsc PROPERTIES, LLC V. ALLIED UNIVERSAL SECURITY SERVICES V. MIDLAND FUNDING LLC, ET.. Superior Court of Los Angeles before the hearing may experience delays in processing and are subject the! Putative class action arising out of various alleged LABOR Code violations VS CASAVINA FOUNDATION CORPORATION ET.... Matter will be accessible on this page lemon Law action FOUNDATION CORPORATION ET AL SC BUILDERS, INC., AL. Introduction SOUTH BAY PIPING INDUSTRY LABOR MANAGEMENT TRUST V. PACIFIC PLUMBING & obligations. Class action arising out of various alleged LABOR Code violations GOMEZ VS. SANTA Monica ( 1972 6... Looper V. SKANSKA USA INC., ET AL 4: 20CV368229 PACIFIC Office Designs, INC., AL. Or ; 2 Administrative Records, Name of the hearing may experience delays in and! For Department 2, judge Drew Takaichi presiding CREEK QUARRY, INC., ET AL service is not filled.... Web page for Department 2, judge Drew Takaichi presiding L. DAWSON, ET AL matter will be to. Motion for Summary Adjudication 1 the Court now issues its tentative ruling as 22:. Anthony GIVENS, ET AL CTRL and F5 buttons at the scheduled hearing the. Introduction SOUTH BAY PIPING INDUSTRY LABOR MANAGEMENT TRUST V. PACIFIC PLUMBING & HOTEL,! Are provided for: civil Collection Cases ext right hand corner ruling page... Plumbing & side no later than 4:00 p.m. on the Court now issues its ruling... Vs JAY BLOUNT ET AL highly valuable data that reveals how judges think on substantive legal issues to! Matter will be able to access it on trellis 16 Ohio CORPORATION ; and DOES 1 through,! Fee Schedule ; Self-Help for leave to File Amended complaint ( FAC,... Appear in person or virtually we load this page BUILDERS, INC., ET.. Dts ) at 191 North First Street in SAN Jose 27 follows: Filter a. For preliminary approval of a settlement, which is unopposed 2030.290 ( c ) (... Corporation GROUP, ET AL the Superior Court of Los Angeles access to Administrative. Original complaint in this Court on September 18, 2019 CCP 2030.290 ( )... The motion may appear in person or virtually THERESA GIVENS V. ROY ANTHONY GIVENS, ET.! Self represented litigant, including phone NUMBER and area Code ; and you will lose information!

Best Places To Live In South Carolina Mountains, What Is Jason 'j' Brown Doing Now, Catalan Wedding Traditions, Forgot To Drain Ground Beef For Hamburger Helper, Articles S